Browse the journal
✦ Welcome to my corner
I came from New York to investigate things that respectable people have sensibly left alone. These are my notes. Dates before 2003 belong to my original field journal; the newest page bears the date it reached this archive.
LOOSE NOTES · drag to rearrange
FIELD KIT:
torch ✓
compass ✓
dry socks ... ?
REMEMBER:
Ask Marla about the castle hinges.
Also: return her book.
LAB REPORTKettle: 2
Gordon: 0

Is this getting through?
30 September 2026 · received entry
Even now, I cannot tell whether these words reach anyone.
X marks the place on every map I draw, but none of them leads home.
I am alive. I finally found a way to send this, if not a way to follow it.
For all the good it has done me, I wish I had never touched the SunSeeker.
I miss Marla. Sometimes I dream she is making tea in the next room, and for a few seconds after I wake I can still hear the spoon against her mug. I would give every notebook I own to be annoyed by that sound again.
There are long stretches when I cannot get a single word out. Then a connection opens and I send everything before it disappears. I have no idea which messages arrive. If this one does, please believe the first useful thing I have managed to tell you: I am still here.
I kept the original photographs. They remember more than I do.
Marla kept our recovery instructions. The private survey explains what I need you to do. I am not asking anyone to go into an actual tunnel. I have done enough of that for all of us.
Back to top ↑
The map under the map
18 December 2002 · field journal
The sheet I thought was a drainage plan belongs to a tunnel network extended by military engineers in 1944. The eastern entrance passes below the culvert, then bends west under the village to the castle hill. It connects the compass bend I marked in April 2001 to the old foundations. I had been treating the two places as separate problems. The ground apparently had not.
A stores ledger records a recovered instrument arriving in November 1945. The army kept one secure section in use until February 1946; only then were the access doors sealed. The transfer sheet calls the instrument SunSeeker. A sketch shows four suns around a movable needle. The last recorded position is a case beyond the western service door.
The document describes equipment recovered from a German military store. It does not establish who made it. A pencil note about occult research is a pencil note, not evidence that somebody in a uniform understood what they had. I will not promote it into a theory just because it would make an excellent first paragraph.
Marla checked my route against the parish copy and found a missing cross-passage. She is keeping the corrected plan and our Moon Boot instructions. If my signal stops, she will preserve the archive instead of following me underground. We agreed this aloud, twice. I disliked the second time more.
The torch works. The spare batteries work. I have written down when I expect to return. That last sentence ought not to feel like the most important measurement of the day.
Back to top ↑
The Moon Boot Project
3 December 2002 · field journal
Marla has named the recovery protocol after my boots. Apparently the mud makes me walk as if I am exploring the Moon. I objected on scientific grounds: lunar dust is considerably drier.
The joke has stuck. The Moon Boot Project is now a folder containing duplicate notes, our surface survey and a test message. Marla keeps the folder. I keep the instruments. For once, the more sensible person has the paperwork.
If these faults can carry information at all, I expect fragments: a page, a photograph, a few numbers. This is a recovery protocol for something we do not yet understand, not a working radio. An observer on the other side may be able to return a stable sequence when my own reference points fail. That is a hypothesis, not an invitation to crawl into the nearest hole.
Marla made one condition: if this becomes a rescue, nobody improvises alone. I have signed the folder. She says this does not count as following instructions yet.
Back to top ↑
Four suns, one needle
17 October 2002 · field log 38
The instrument in the archive sketch resembles a compass designed by someone who had heard of north and found it limiting. Four suns surround a needle mounted inside two rings. No maker's mark. No scale I recognise.
WORKING MODELA compass compares its position to one field. This object may compare one place to several possible versions of that place. The rings would tune the comparison; the four suns would mark agreement, not directions.LIMITI have a drawing and a collection of inconsistent measurements. I do not yet have the instrument. Please read the previous paragraph with the appropriate amount of suspicion.
The old travellers' accounts may describe uncontrolled crossings at the same weak points. An artefact could make a crossing deliberate without being responsible for every accidental one. The question is no longer simply whether a doorway exists. It is whether it can be aimed.
Back to top ↑
The woman with the cupboard key
28 September 2002 · field journal
Marla met Ruth Mercer while helping put away chairs at the parish hall. Ruth volunteers at the visitor office and looks after the parish papers. I have spent months asking whether anyone has old records. Marla helped with six chairs and found the person with the key.
Ruth let us use a table on Thursday afternoon. She brought out walking-group notebooks, copies of estate correspondence and a cupboard's worth of wartime paperwork. The boxes had been moved twice after a leak. One labelled CHURCH HEATING contained no useful information about church heating, but did contain a drawing of a very odd instrument. I am prepared to forgive the label.
She allowed me to take duplicate copies of a few pages and copy the rest by hand. The originals stay with her. She also asked me to write down which box each page came from, rather than simply writing IMPORTANT across the top. Apparently I am not the first researcher she has supervised.
There are references to stores below the village and a service plan that is not in its folder. Ruth thinks another bundle may be with the old estate papers. She will ask. For now I have a drawing, some dates and a sensible warning that papers filed together do not necessarily belong together.
Marla carried the copies home under her coat when it rained. I carried the empty biscuit tin. Our contributions to the expedition have been carefully documented.
Back to top ↑
What stayed put
22 June 2002 · field log 29
Some promised results, because a notebook full of “repeat tomorrow” is a diary with expensive accessories.
LANTERN FOLLOW-UPAt the ordinary control site, moths behaved normally. At the east bend, they stayed near the same patch of ground after we exchanged the lanterns. That weakens the dirty-glass explanation. It does not tell us what they sensed.PATH FOLLOW-UPAt noon, both directions measured 426 m. After dusk, the return measurement shortened again. Marla's independent tally agreed. We marked a third point rather than trusting the endpoints alone.COMPASS FOLLOW-UPThe affected strip follows the old service line. The deviation changes between visits while the buried iron stays where the plans put it. Iron may contribute; it does not explain the whole record.
Marla noticed that the missing length, the needle change and the moths recur together. I had filed them under three headings. She put the notebooks side by side. This was a very cheap improvement to the laboratory.
We now survey together before dusk and stop if the marks cease to agree. I have cancelled the night trials. I wish that had been my idea.
Back to top ↑
Two red points — addendum
18 March 2002 · field log 21
I went back to the east path with a lantern, three strips of reflective tape, and a plan. The plan was to stay behind the fence. At 21:14, two red points appeared between the second and third marked trees, roughly eighteen metres away. I could see no body around them. I checked the distance twice because writing roughly eighteen metres feels more professional than writing too close.
OBSERVATION / 21:14–21:16The points held their height while I crouched and moved the lantern. No blink in the fifty-two seconds I watched continuously. When I covered the lantern, both points remained visible.WORKING EXPLANATIONSReflection from my lantern cannot explain that, though moonlight might. Survey reflectors should not move together. I may have misjudged the distance in the dark.
At 21:16, the points shifted left of the third tree without any sound I could separate from the wind. My notes end there because I left. Running is not an instrument reading, but it is a repeatable response.
I told Marla the result was inconclusive. That is true. I did not tell her I had already reached the gate when I remembered to look back. I have now written down that omission, which makes it no less embarrassing.
Back to top ↑
Two red points
14 March 2002 · field journal
Something stood between the trees past the east path last night. I could make out no edge to it, only a length of dark that was somehow darker than the rest. Two red points remained level and open when I swung the lamp away.
The village has a story about a thing called the Shadow. I would prefer an animal, bad sleep, or a reflection from the survey markers. I have measured the markers. None is red. This is the point at which a scientist is supposed to make another measurement instead of buying a larger lock for his door. I have done both.
Back to top ↑
Christmas indoors
27 December 2001 · field journal
Marla invited me to Christmas at her place. She called it a rescue operation, which was kind of her. My cabin had developed a draught with ambitions of becoming a second front door.
She let me dry my boots by the fire and pretended not to notice how long it took me to work up the nerve to take her hand. Outside, the street was white and almost quiet. I have spent months looking for impossible things in this village. That evening, the most unlikely thing was being asked to stay for another cup of tea.
Her house is beyond the village, outside the stretch where my instruments disagree with the maps. She took me there along the ordinary roads. I have started to appreciate ordinary roads.
Back to top ↑
The path I measured twice
9 November 2001 · field log 16
The footpath from the split oak to the east culvert is supposed to be a fixed distance. I say supposed to because Marla and I spent an entire afternoon demonstrating that two people, one survey tape, and two numbered endpoint pegs can disagree with a path.
METHODWe marked both endpoints, kept the tape along the centre of the path, and counted each thirty-metre length aloud. Marla wrote the numbers separately so my arithmetic could not infect hers.RESULTOak to culvert: 426 m. Culvert to oak: 389 m. Both endpoint pegs were still in place when we finished.
Thirty-seven metres is too much to blame on a damp tape. It is also too much to put in a letter to my old department without expecting a polite suggestion that I spend more time indoors. A hidden fork, a moved marker, or a shared mistake is still more likely than a footpath changing its mind.
Tomorrow we repeat the survey at noon. Marla has volunteered to carry the notebook and declined to carry the tape. She says scientific progress should occasionally involve somebody else's muddy boots. I cannot fault her methodology.
Back to top ↑
Payment in cream
4 November 2001 · field journal
Mrs Bell invited me into her kitchen to discuss a brownie. I brought a notebook. She had already put out a small bowl of cream by the hearth, which ruled out at least one misunderstanding.
She says the visits began after her husband hurt his hand. They would leave the breakfast things overnight and find the spoons washed, the hearth swept and kindling stacked beside the grate. She leaves cream. She does not leave a note. Apparently calling it payment would be rude.
I asked whether a neighbour might have a key. Two do. I asked whether she ever got up in the night and forgot about it. She looked at me until I found a better question.
Her one sighting was brief: something small and brown standing on a chair, holding a dishcloth in both hands. When she reached for the lamp, it was gone. She showed me the chair. Its legs had felt pads. I have no measurement that will distinguish a helpful household spirit from an excellent story told beside a warm stove.
She would not let me leave a camera. I have recorded this as testimony, not an observation of my own. The house is hers, and whatever is doing the washing-up has a better attendance record than most research assistants.
At home I left a bowl of cream beside my own hearth. By morning it contained a moth. Recruitment continues.
Back to top ↑
For a town that isn't here
6 October 2001 · field journal
I have now heard the same impossible detail from people separated by decades, occupations and every other useful line on my index cards. They remember a world in which Argleton simply is not there. No vanished houses or ruined church. Just a stretch of land where our town should be.
The Argleton tourist office would be devastated to learn it had built an entire website for a place that apparently does not exist. I should probably tell them after they have paid the hosting bill. In the meantime, I am trying to work out why people who have never met use the same words when they describe that empty patch.
Back to top ↑
The lantern moths
16 September 2001 · field log 09
At 21:17, six pale moths settled on my unlit lantern by the east path. I lit it. They left. I put it out. They came back. This is inconvenient behaviour from an insect whose entire reputation depends on doing the opposite.
THREE TRIALSLantern dark: six, five, then six moths on the glass. Lantern lit: none stayed longer than a few seconds. A clean, unfuelled lantern gave the same result. Marla kept her torch aimed at the ground throughout.UNTESTEDTemperature of the glass, scent from my coat, and whether the insects respond to the lantern or to this particular stretch of path.
Marla held the stopwatch and asked whether I had considered that they were avoiding me. I had not. This is why a second researcher is useful, even one who insists on calling the experiment “Gordon loses an argument to six insects.”
Next time I will move the lantern away from the path. If they follow it, I investigate the glass. If they stay, I investigate the ground. If they follow Marla, I go home and reconsider my qualifications.
Back to top ↑
Proof that I do, in fact, have a roof
9 September 2001 · field journal
Some of you asked what a forest research station looks like. It is a rented cabin with a desk, a damp path, and a kettle whose opinion of me has not improved. Here are two photographs from today. I have put the original files here for anyone who wants to keep them; the little pictures below are only previews.
Marla says I should write more useful notes on the backs of things. I told her files do not have backs. She gave me the look that means I am about to learn otherwise.
Back to top ↑
In which we were not invited
26 August 2001 · field journal
Marla took me to Argleton Castle after closing. By “took,” I mean she found a gap in the fence and asked whether New Yorkers always waited for permission. I followed, partly for research and mostly because she was smiling.
The old stair was slippery, the upper passage smelled of rain, and the noise behind the wall was probably a nesting bird. I was explaining this when she took my hand and pulled me away from a rotten board. She has already told the story three times and improves my scream with each version. We saw no ghost. I did, however, lose an argument and gain a reason to visit the Muddy Field again.
Back to top ↑
A perfectly ordinary interview
12 August 2001 · field journal
I met Marla at the Muddy Field, which is Argleton's only pub and therefore the village's most efficient information service. I introduced myself as a researcher of local anomalies. She asked whether the anomaly was my accent or the mud on my boots.
She listened to the witness accounts more seriously than most of my colleagues do, then told me half of the stories I had copied were told wrong. I bought her another drink. She said the castle might answer one of my questions, if I was willing to stop reading about it and go there. I said that sounded sensible. It did not, of course. I hope she asks again.
Back to top ↑
The shape of a coincidence
21 June 2001 · field journal
There are days when every story points to the same place and I think I have found the beginning of something enormous. Then I remember that I chose which stories to pin to the wall. A cabin gives a man room to think and far too much room to agree with himself.
I sent a careful letter to a colleague in New York. The reply was polite, which is worse than ridicule. She asked for a control, a date, a source that did not come from a story about another story. She is right. Tomorrow I will go back to the stream with the compass and begin again.
Back to top ↑
Something has borrowed my keys
18 May 2001 · field journal
My cabin keys disappeared from the hook beside the door. I checked the desk, my coat and every pocket twice. On the second circuit I heard them jingle inside the empty kettle.
I had looked inside it less than a minute earlier. I am writing that down because it is the part I would otherwise improve in the telling. The lid was on. I did not see the keys arrive.
At the Muddy Field, a man repairing a stool said I had a boggart. He said it with the weary certainty I reserve for a leaking roof. His advice was to stop making a fuss, because they enjoy an audience. This is an awkward recommendation for a man whose only useful professional skill is paying attention.
I put the keys back, laid a strip of paper across the kettle lid and sat where I could see both. Nothing happened for forty minutes. Then something behind the stove made a noise remarkably like my cough. I moved the stove. There was a dry leaf, a bent nail and no obvious comedian.
A mouse, an echo and my own poor memory remain a perfectly serviceable explanation, provided they are willing to work together. The keys now live on a cord around my neck. The kettle can apply for its own set.
Back to top ↑
North, apparently, is optional
7 April 2001 · field log 04
My compass is behaving perfectly everywhere except the bend on the old east path. There, its needle swings thirty-one degrees west of the position it takes forty paces away. I removed my watch and the keys from my pockets, held the compass at arm's length, and repeated the walk six times. The needle changed at the same place on all six. My legs have filed a complaint.
CONTROLA borrowed compass made the same turn at the bend. Both instruments behaved normally beside my desk and at the next bend. Weather: dry, light wind. I have marked the spot with blue thread.WORKING EXPLANATIONBuried iron or an old cable. The direction of a needle is not evidence for anything more exciting until I have ruled those out.
Tomorrow I will bring a measuring tape and find out how wide the affected patch is. If it turns out to be a pipe, I owe the pipe an apology and myself a quieter notebook. If it does not, I may need a third compass and a colleague who still returns my letters.
Back to top ↑
Accounts of an absence
15 March 2001 · field journal
This is why I came to the forest. A farmer's grandfather wrote about a lost traveller before the war. A nurse recorded a confused patient decades later. Last autumn, a visitor arrived with a road map that ended at fields where Argleton stands. None appears to have known the others. Each insisted they came from a world without this village.
Ordinary explanations deserve the first turn: bad maps, family legends, a prank repeated well. I am collecting the dates before I decide what, if anything, remains. My supervisor in New York would have preferred that I study fungi. So would I. Fungus has the decency to grow on a slide.
Back to top ↑
New York to nowhere
18 February 2001 · field journal
My name is Gordon Lakes. I left New York with two trunks of books and a grant that will be difficult to explain at the next review. I am in a rented cabin outside Argleton, Lancashire, studying old objects, strange local creatures and stories that other researchers tend to file under “charming nonsense.”
The forest is quiet enough that I can hear the kettle begin to complain from the other room. It is currently my only research assistant. It has no qualifications, but neither of us has yet resigned. I will use this page to record what I can verify, what I suspect, and—when I remember—the difference.
Back to top ↑